Rich Burridge wrote: > Just searched the archives for this and found the threads starting at: > > http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/pkg-discuss/2009-April/013126.html > http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/pkg-discuss/2009-April/013139.html > http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/pkg-discuss/2009-April/013140.html > http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/pkg-discuss/2009-April/013168.html > > Looks like this wasn't a Stephen decision (my apologies) but David signed > off on it: > > http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/pkg-discuss/2009-April/013202.html
True, but there wasn't any discussion of the gcc- prefix w.r.t. the separated runtime packages. I agree that for the combined package, "runtime-432" doesn't make much sense, but "libobjc" does (or might). Danek _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
