Frank Batschulat (Home) wrote:

> On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:44:33 +0100, Frank Batschulat (Home) 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> >
> > apparently after going to build 134 (at least thats where
> > I recognized it, so might have been 133)
> >
> > a proviously installed gcc package doesn't seem to be completely upgraded ?
> >
> > on 134:
> >
> > osoldev.batschul./export/home/batschul.=> pfexec find / -name gcc -ls
> > 180280    2 drwxr-xr-x   3 root     bin             3 Mar  9 21:22 /usr/gcc
> > 180325    2 drwxr-xr-x   3 root     bin             3 Mar  9 21:22 
> > /usr/gcc/4.3/lib/gcc
> > 182429  515 -rwxr-xr-x   3 root     bin        495924 Mar  9 21:22 
> > /usr/gcc/4.3/bin/gcc
> > 262926    1 lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     root            9 Oct 31 20:59 
> > /usr/bin/gcc -> gcc-4.3.2
> >
> > so stuff on the 9th, yesterday was when I upgraded from 133 to 134,
> > the symlink that shall provice /usr/bin/gcc is apparently a bit older.
> >
> > did the package renaming missed that ?
> 
> at least installing gcc package 4.3 from scratch does not come
> with any link "/usr/bin/gcc" at all.
> 
> perhaps we should add it ?

I don't think the gcc4 packages deliver it at all.  Run

    pkg search -l /usr/bin/gcc

and

    pkg verify <pkgname>

where "<pkgname>" is the package name in the fourth column of the search
output.  My guess is you switched the link manually at some point.

Danek
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to