A couple more answers from some off-list discussions:
- The x11/server/xorg & x11/server/xorg/driver/xorg-misc packages
simply reflect the current packaging in 133 & later - those aren't
changed by this proposal. The breakdown & naming isn't the most
logical, but I wasn't changing that at this point.
- The x11/x11-config package currently contains the x11-server &
ogl-select SMF manifests and the RBAC *attr & help files associated
with those SMF manifests. The scanpci exec_attr entry currently in
this package would move to the diagnostic/scanpci package.
These services should probably be split into their own packages,
probably x11/server/xserver-common (with other files that all X
servers share, in case you wanted a system with Xvnc but not Xorg)
and service/application/opengl/ogl-select (mirroring the SMF service
name).
- The x11/session/xdm package name is what's currently in the system,
but looking at the gdm packages, it probably should match those, and
instead be system/display-manager/xdm. I think I'd leave the others
in x11/session/* though, since xinit is not what I usually think of
as a display manager.
- developer/build/lndir, though delivered by Xorg as a build utility,
probably fits better as file/lndir, since it may be useful in other
contexts. (It builds a directory hierarchy with symlinks to each
individual file in an existing directory hierarchy - it's not yet
been ARC'ed, but probably should be, since other platforms deliver
it, and it would reduce the amount of bootstrapping needed to get
our X builds going.)
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [email protected]
Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
