Shawn Walker wrote:
> verexec-docs/isaexec.1:
> line 27: shouldn't that be "i86" directories? (e.g. /usr/bin/i86/) ?
> Or is that just a somewhat silly practice that's in current use?
> (I'm assuming a directory named i386 would work, we just don't
> appear to use that.)
I used i386 subdirectories with isaexec in /usr/X11/bin and they worked
fine, but had to switch to i86 when X moved to /usr/bin due to the
ancient /usr/bin/i386 binary claiming the namespace in that particular
directory.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [email protected]
Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
