On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 14:42 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
> > I'll have a look - I assumed people were only ever importing into
> > repositories that looked like the production ones. It sounds like the
> > right thing to do would be to query the repository for the publisher
> > prefix it provides, and use that instead.
>
> I ran across this as well when doing the build 142 resync as I
> typically use a different publisher than "opensolaris.org" as part of
> the import.
Alright, I'll file a bug and start working on the fix right away.
> > Feel like starting to write some unit tests for importer.py - or better
> > yet, start transitioning over to using the real publishing tools?
>
> To be fair, the importer is still the primary way packages get into
> RE's repo. :-)
Do we have a time line to get consolidations to move? In this case at
least, writing the extra code to teach importer.py about SMF
dependencies was a bit time consuming and (in this case, obviously)
prone to error (sorry again)
cheers,
tim
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
