On 11/08/2010 15:56, Frank Batschulat wrote:
I did a fresh install of 142 on sparc and then upgraded to 143 and 144 and even 145 without having encounted this problem
Yes, I think it's just fresh installs.
so using 142 as a base and then pkg-image update appears to be fine from my own experience on sparc.
Thanks for the datapoint.
though I run into this only on sparc with 144: http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=16678 which is an instance of: http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=16714
Hmm, those bugs seemt to suggest that 142 is broken, at least for sparc. I wonder if 143 is OK?
-- Alan Burlison -- _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
