On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 10:32:58PM -0700, Edward Pilatowicz wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 05:41:57PM -0700, Brock Pytlik wrote: > > On 05/ 3/11 04:56 PM, Edward Pilatowicz wrote: > > >On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 01:28:06PM -0700, Brock Pytlik wrote: > > >>Webrev: > > >>http://cr.opensolaris.org/~bpytlik/ips-18240-v1/ > > >> > > >>Bug: > > >> 18240 zone proxy needed > > >> > > >[snip] > > >--------- > > >src/svc/zoneproxyd.xml > > > > > >- why are zones dependant upon this service instead of the other way > > > around? > > [snip] > > K asked you and Dan months ago and did what you (collectively) told him to. > > > > hm. perhaps we understood things better there, but right now this still > doesn't seem great. so what happens when: > > - the system boots. > - the zone smf service tries to autoboot a zone. > - the zone boot script tries to start the zone proxy. > - the zone proxy has to delay for the zone service to finish coming > online. > > seems kinda like a deadlock to me. >
hm. but i guess that if we make the zones service dependant upon this service then it's a requirement for zones. i'm ok with this but i think other folks wanted to leave this service as optional. i think that if we want to make it optional we should probably just remove this dependency. ed _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
