On 05/ 3/11 03:23 PM, Brock Pytlik wrote:
[snip]
zoneproxy-adm/zoneproxy-adm.c:
- line 58: this doesn't constitute a failure?
I don't think so? I think it means that the zoneproxy-d isn't
running. I
guess I can make it a failure. To hopefully avoid needless round trips,
is the right thing to do to print an error then call exit (1)?
That's what I'd do. But if it's okay that it exits 0 when the daemon
isn't
running, that's okay; it just seemed wrong to me.
I checked w/ K on a couple of other things and he said that since
proxyd is multi-threaded, that libumem was a win.
Oh, I almost forgot. zoneproxy-cllient does need to start as root. It
drops privs as soon as it can.
Brock
Thanks,
Brock
Danek
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
