On 05/15/11 03:44 PM, Tim Foster wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 15:23 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>> It's not upsetting as much as preventing me from declaring that X is
>> pkglint clean and needs to stay that way.
>
> Yep, I understand. Diffing against a whitelist would seem to be the
> only way out for now till we get this bug fixed and you could say "No
> new pkglint errors or warnings should be produced" until then.
>
> Admittedly that's a bit more work, but there's precedent in the pkg-gate
> which you could copy/paste.
Yeah, it's what I already have to do for validate_pkg checks in X too,
since a couple of it's complaints are things that shouldn't be fixed
(binaries in the proto area not being setuid to match the manifests,
hard links to isaexec even though isaexec is not in any of our packages).
I can add these to the list our error reporting script ignores.
Thanks for looking into this and filing the bug.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [email protected]
Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
