No worries - if we're renaming the service as well, I'd just like to get consensus. In the gate, we have:pkg:/package/pkg/system-repository delivering svc:/application/pkg/system-repository:default svc:/system/zones-proxyd:default svc:/system/zones-proxy-client:default At risk of bikeshedding, I slightly prefer "zones-proxy" over "zoneproxy", adding a hyphen and making plural since we already have, eg. "svc:/system/zones-monitoring" and "svc:/system/zones". Do the service names need to match the binaries involved (which are zoneproxy-adm, zoneproxy-client and zoneproxyd) in which case I could also rename those, but wanted to check that was ok before doing so. Anyway could I propose we have: pkg:/package/pkg/system-repository delivering svc:/application/pkg/system-repository:default pkg:/package/pkg/zones-proxy delivering svc:/application/pkg/zones-proxyd:default svc:/application/pkg/zones-proxy-client:default
I'm fine with this particular color for the shed. _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
