On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 12:16:20AM +0200, Albin Tonnerre wrote: > On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 09:40:27PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote : > > On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 08:38:27PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > > you will find that SHR uses libetk, which is not developed anymore by > > > upstream and which the pkg-e team would rather want to avoid to package, > > > so you’ll have to package that yourself for now (and upload to pkg-fso > > > for now). > > > ok, thanks for the hint. I will see what to do once I reach this > > point. Perhaps I can convince upstream to remove the dependency :) > > Please note that I have done some work on etk, so feel free to contact me if > you're willing to maintain this as part of the fso effort
I now reached libframeworkd-phonegui-efl, the etk using library. I had a look at the sourcecode and there is quite some etk usage, so I guess they won't remove etk dependency. So some questions :) 1. Is [1] the place of your work? 2. Any particular reason you don't want to maintain it? 3. Do you want me to create a new git repository in pkg-fso, or should I use the pkg-e one? -- Sebastian [1] http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-e/libs/etk.git;a=summary
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-fso-maint mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-fso-maint
