On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 06:39:49PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote: > Hi there! > > Disclaimer: I have never tried phoneuid nor looked into the > package/code. > > On Fri, 14 May 2010 15:36:57 +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 06:16:29PM +0200, Visti Andresen wrote: > >> Shouldn't phoneuid/libphone-ui-20100213 depend on libphone-ui-shr? As: > >> > >> phoneuid needs shr.so which seems to be supplied by libphone-ui-shr > >> > >> phoneuid depends on libphone-ui-20100213 which in turn only recommends > >> libphone-ui-shr > [...] > > Debian should install recommends by default now, too. The reason > > libphone-ui does not depend on libphone-ui-shr is, that > > libphone-ui-shr build depends on libphone-ui (=> cycle dependency) > > Sorry, but if phoneuid does not work without libphone-ui-shr, then > phoneuid *must* depend on libphone-ui-shr. > > Thx, bye, > Gismo / Luca
Hi luca, :) Currently it's like this: Runtime: phoneuid needs libphone-ui libphone-ui needs libphone-ui-implementation libphone-ui-shr provides libphone-ui-implementation Buildtime: phoneuid needs libphone-ui libphone-ui needs nothing libphone-ui-shr needs libphone-ui Currently I added libphone-ui-shr to the recommends of libphone-ui. Addin a dependency there would result in a circular build dependency. If I got you right I should manually add libphone-ui-shr/libphone-ui-implementation to every package using libphone-ui (which is just phoneuid at the moment iirc)? -- Sebastian
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-fso-maint mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-fso-maint
