OK - good idea. I’ve done the rename and pushed to alioth. I did a rebuild and it was all fine but please double check! Luckily there are no reverse dependencies on this package yet.
Thanks, Tim. > On 13 Aug 2015, at 3:11 pm, Michael Stapelberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think before uploading, we should take the opportunity to make the > package comply with our new naming scheme. Once you’ve done that I’m > happy to take a look at it. > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi everyone. I noticed a while ago that a tag was made for v3 (yay) and >> Tianon has even >> packaged it up. It hasn’t been uploaded though - is there anything holding >> it up? >> >> >> Tim. >> >>> On 9 Jun 2015, at 10:50 am, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I submitted a github issue asking if they would be so kind as to make >>> another snapshot. No response yet - I’ve got an email address to try out >>> before saying this hasn’t worked. >>> >>> >>> Tim. >>> >>>> On 9 Jun 2015, at 5:54 am, Tianon Gravi <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Yeah, it's been my experience that upstream's usually pretty >>>> responsive with these kinds of requests (which is what makes me think >>>> they're worth at least poking before we go head-first into a >>>> snapshot). >>>> >>>> ♥, >>>> - Tianon >>>> 4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36 4FD4 036A 9C25 BF35 7DD4 >>>> >>>> >>>> On 8 June 2015 at 12:52, Michael Stapelberg <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> That sure would be nice. Depending on the urgency, I’d be okay with >>>>> uploading a snapshot if upstream doesn’t reply quickly, though. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Tianon Gravi <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Oh jeez, my response must've been from my phone before I configured it >>>>>> to reply-all by default: >>>>>> >>>>>> Why not ask upstream to tag a v3 instead of packaging a snapshot? >>>>>> >>>>>> ♥, >>>>>> - Tianon >>>>>> 4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36 4FD4 036A 9C25 BF35 7DD4 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 8 June 2015 at 12:29, Michael Stapelberg <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Sorry for the late reply. This all sounds good to me, please go ahead. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi everyone. I’d like to propose an update to the golang-go-systemd >>>>>>>> package, to pull in files from the unit directory require for fleet. >>>>>>>> Here’s >>>>>>>> a debdiff between the version in Debian and my changes: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> debdiff /var/cache/apt/archives/golang-go-systemd-dev_2-1_all.deb >>>>>>>> /Source/pkg-go/build-area/golang-go-systemd-dev_2~git20150505-1_all.deb >>>>>>>> [The following lists of changes regard files as different if they have >>>>>>>> different names, permissions or owners.] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Files in second .deb but not in first >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> -rw-r--r-- root/root >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/coreos/go-systemd/activation/packetconns.go >>>>>>>> -rw-r--r-- root/root >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/coreos/go-systemd/activation/packetconns_test.go >>>>>>>> -rw-r--r-- root/root >>>>>>>> /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/coreos/go-systemd/daemon/sdnotify.go >>>>>>>> -rw-r--r-- root/root >>>>>>>> /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/coreos/go-systemd/machine1/dbus.go >>>>>>>> -rw-r--r-- root/root >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/coreos/go-systemd/machine1/dbus_test.go >>>>>>>> -rw-r--r-- root/root >>>>>>>> /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/coreos/go-systemd/unit/deserialize.go >>>>>>>> -rw-r--r-- root/root >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/coreos/go-systemd/unit/deserialize_test.go >>>>>>>> -rw-r--r-- root/root >>>>>>>> /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/coreos/go-systemd/unit/escape.go >>>>>>>> -rw-r--r-- root/root >>>>>>>> /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/coreos/go-systemd/unit/escape_test.go >>>>>>>> -rw-r--r-- root/root >>>>>>>> /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/coreos/go-systemd/unit/option.go >>>>>>>> -rw-r--r-- root/root >>>>>>>> /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/coreos/go-systemd/unit/option_test.go >>>>>>>> -rw-r--r-- root/root >>>>>>>> /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/coreos/go-systemd/unit/serialize.go >>>>>>>> -rw-r--r-- root/root >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/coreos/go-systemd/unit/serialize_test.go >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format) >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>> Built-Using: golang (= [-2:1.2.1-2),-] {+2:1.4.2-3),+} golang-dbus (= >>>>>>>> [-1-1)-] {+2-1)+} >>>>>>>> Installed-Size: [-120-] {+137+} >>>>>>>> Version: [-2-1-] {+2~git20150505-1+} >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As you can see files are only added so this should be a change that >>>>>>>> does >>>>>>>> not break any existing packages. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please let me know if this is OK and I can push the updates to the >>>>>>>> pkg-go/packages repo. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tim. >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>> Michael >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> Michael >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > Michael
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers
