Dmitry, On 20/06/16 05:11, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> I think your procedure could be improved if "git merge upstream/2.1" > is modified with "--squash" to produce one neat merge commit to "master" > instead of flood of upstream commits that make it difficult to identify > packaging-related commits. Merge from upstream branch that follows upstream > history makes it difficult to review packaging changes therefore I see it as > counter-productive especially for team-maintained packages. I do not mind > having full upstream history in "upstream" branch but not in "master"... I've never tried that. I don't really have any issue with having all the commits, as it is pretty clear to me which ones belong to debian, but I will give it a try. >> I am just confused >> as to why you removed the Build-Using field in control.. > > Because it was used on arch-all -dev package shipping sources... Sorry about that, I got it now. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) _______________________________________________ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers
