On 20/06/16 05:11, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> I think your procedure could be improved if "git merge upstream/2.1"
> is modified with "--squash" to produce one neat merge commit to "master"
> instead of flood of upstream commits that make it difficult to identify
> packaging-related commits. Merge from upstream branch that follows upstream
> history makes it difficult to review packaging changes therefore I see it as
> counter-productive especially for team-maintained packages. I do not mind
> having full upstream history in "upstream" branch but not in "master"...
I've never tried that. I don't really have any issue with having all the
commits, as it is pretty clear to me which ones belong to debian, but I
will give it a try.
>> I am just confused
>> as to why you removed the Build-Using field in control..
> Because it was used on arch-all -dev package shipping sources...
Sorry about that, I got it now.
Martín Ferrari (Tincho)
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list