On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Arnaud Rebillout < arnaud.rebill...@collabora.com> wrote:
> > > On 03/20/2018 02:36 PM, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 3:29 AM, Arnaud Rebillout < > arnaud.rebill...@collabora.com> wrote: > >> Hello all, let me follow up on this ! >> >> According to discussions on this mailing list, I made the following >> changes on the packages: >> - the license issues have been clarified with containerd projects, except >> for containerd-typeurl which doesn't receive much attention from upstream. >> As a consequence I let the copyright to 'containerd', except if there's a >> better thing to do (like, nothing in the copyright field ?). >> - I re-packaged docker-go-metrics to a lower version, so that there is no >> need to bump prometheus-client-golang. >> - I think I addressed most (if all) of the comments from Michael, ie. >> DEP-3 patches, more lintian warnings fixed, and others all along the >> discussion. >> >> So let me sum up here the list of packages we're talking about, and that >> received changes. >> >> FORGET ABOUT (because it's not needed anymore) >> <https://salsa.debian.org/elboulangero-guest/golang-github-d >> mcgowan-go-tar> >> <https://salsa.debian.org/elboulangero-guest/golang-github-dmcgowan-go-tar> >> <https://salsa.debian.org/elboulangero-guest/golang-github-p >> rometheus-client-golang> >> <https://salsa.debian.org/elboulangero-guest/golang-github-prometheus-client-golang> >> >> CLONE AGAIN (don't pull because I re-wrote history) >> >> <https://salsa.debian.org/elboulangero-guest/golang-github-d >> ocker-go-metrics> >> <https://salsa.debian.org/elboulangero-guest/golang-github-docker-go-metrics> >> > > Uploaded. > > >> >> >> PULL - there are a few changes >> >> <https://salsa.debian.org/elboulangero-guest/containerd> >> <https://salsa.debian.org/elboulangero-guest/containerd> >> > > I’ll hold off with this one until the build-deps are satisfied. > > By the way, do you want to include the most recent commits in the > debian/changelog entry? > > > Yep sure, I just updated the changelog and pushed it all. > I can’t seem to build this because https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/golang-github-opencontainers-image-spec is broken, and I’m not entirely sure why/how to fix it. Any hints welcome. > > > > >> <https://salsa.debian.org/elboulangero-guest/continuity> >> <https://salsa.debian.org/elboulangero-guest/continuity> >> > > Looks good. Can you move this repository to its intended location > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/continuity please? > > > Repo moved. > Uploaded. > > > > <https://salsa.debian.org/elboulangero-guest/golang-github-c >> ontainerd-btrfs> >> <https://salsa.debian.org/elboulangero-guest/golang-github-containerd-btrfs> >> > > The description for golang-github-containerd-btrfs-dev should be > trimmed: upstream’s recommendation to vendor the package doesn’t make sense > in Debian, and neither does the contribution guidelines. > > Looks good otherwise. Can you move it to https://salsa.debian.org/go > -team/packages/golang-github-containerd-btrfs please? > > > Description updated, repo moved. > Uploaded. > > > > <https://salsa.debian.org/elboulangero-guest/golang-github-c >> ontainerd-typeurl> >> <https://salsa.debian.org/elboulangero-guest/golang-github-containerd-typeurl> >> > > Looks good. Can you move this to https://salsa.debian.org/go > -team/packages/golang-github-containerd-typeurl please? > > > Repo moved. > Uploaded. > > > > <https://salsa.debian.org/elboulangero-guest/golang-github-d >> ocker-go-events> >> <https://salsa.debian.org/elboulangero-guest/golang-github-docker-go-events> >> > > Uploaded. > > <https://salsa.debian.org/elboulangero-guest/golang-github-o >> pencontainers-image-spec> >> <https://salsa.debian.org/elboulangero-guest/golang-github-opencontainers-image-spec> >> > > This one is missing a debian/changelog entry for your changes. > > > Indeed, I pushed some last changes. > Looks good, can you move it please? > > > <https://salsa.debian.org/elboulangero-guest/golang-gogottrpc> >> <https://salsa.debian.org/elboulangero-guest/golang-gogottrpc> >> > > Looks good. Can you move this to https://salsa.debian.org/el > boulangero-guest/golang-gogottrpc please? > > > Repo moved. > Uploaded. > > > > >> >> >> PULL - these packages have been rejected due to copyright issues >> >> <https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-con >> tainerd-console> >> <https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-containerd-console> >> > > Uploaded. > > >> <https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-containerd-fifo> >> <https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-containerd-fifo> >> > > Uploaded. > > >> <https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-con >> tainerd-go-runc> >> <https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-containerd-go-runc> >> > > Uploaded. > > > Ok, according to the mails from FTP Masters 'fifo' and 'go-runc' have made > it to the NEW queue. > > However 'console' seem to have an issue, it is REJECTED because > 'Source-only uploads' are not accepted. Is there anything I can do here ? > I re-uploaded the amd64 .changes now. > > > > >> >> PULL - this package is already in Debian Sid, should I issue a new Debian >> release due to copyright change ? >> >> <https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-con >> tainerd-cgroups> >> <https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-containerd-cgroups> >> > > Yes please. It’s always good to not leave pending changes lying around > (for people touching the package in the future). > > > Ok done, I let you add the tag on the master branch. BTW there was no tag > for 'version 0.0~git20180223.d578e4e-1'. > Uploaded. > > > > >> >> Ok I think I didn't forget anything :) >> >> Feel free to tell me if there's anything that is still not ok with these >> packages, if there's anything I should do. Like, should I always finish >> with a commit that updates the changelog >> > > Yes please. > > > Noted :) > > > >> (which I didn't do), or not ? Is it OK to have a debian release ending >> with '-2' or more if the package was *never* uploaded before (I know that >> reprepro doesn't like that, but I guess the Debian infra doesn't use >> reprepro). >> > > Debian doesn’t use reprepro, but it would be easier to use -1 until the > package was uploaded. Otherwise, the uploader needs to remember to use the > -v option to include all changelog entries in the .changes file. > > > Ok I'll take care about that, thanks for the explanations. > > Thanks, > > Arnaud > -- Best regards, Michael
_______________________________________________ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers