On 2019-07-16 14:01, Christoph Berg wrote:
Re: Bas Couwenberg 2019-07-16
<[email protected]>
> We have decent test coverage now, can we drop this bit in postgis?
We might be able to drop the PIE handling on Ubuntu, but we're not
testing
on those Ubuntu environment AFAIK.
I forgot to mention that I'm testing+building postgis on
xenial+bionic+disco. (disco is already not in the that list.)
OSGeoLive builds on bionic currently, UbuntGIS supports only LTS
releases, that's why non-LTR releases are not included in the
conditional.
If you can confirm that pie now works on xenial & bionic we can drop
this
code (and the lsb_release B-D).
I don't see any issues besides the general i386 one tracked in
https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/4407
There is not issue in the PostGIS issue tracker for the PIE build
failure, that's a packaging specific issue.
I'll do some clean up of the rule files; currently I'm working on
making the pg-postgis-3 package actually depend on
pg-postgis-3-scripts as getting that installed without the dependency
is really painful, and bad UX. I hope that using "alternatives" for
the *.control files does the trick. Will push a branch for review.
I don't understand this.
postgresql-11-postgis-3 Recommends postgresql-11-postgis-3-scripts so
those should be installed by default unless the default was changed to
not install Recommends.
Is it because -scripts contains unversioned control files and hence
cannot have multiple versions co-installed?
Kind Regards,
Bas
_______________________________________________
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
