On 9/7/19 10:03 PM, Martin Landa wrote: > Hi, > > so 7. 9. 2019 v 21:53 odesÃlatel Sebastiaan Couwenberg > <[email protected]> napsal: >> What you should do is revert this change >> (61453b3e5bfe8f1d40f6d85f835733ea93146c06), the prior one was correct. > > yes, but than libgdal-grass will have different patch version (2) > compared to gdal in unstable (1). I would like to avoid building whole > gdal for ubuntugis if possible.
gdal (2.4.2+dfsg-1~bionic0) is in ubuntugis-unstable for bionic, so no problem. https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugis/+archive/ubuntu/ubuntugis-unstable/+packages?field.name_filter=gdal&field.status_filter=published&field.series_filter=bionic Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 _______________________________________________ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
