Hallo! First of all I am sorry that I havn't react to all gdal relevant emails for a long time. I had contact off-list to a few of you about 2 weeks ago and wanted to send an email to this list with a proposition how to proceed with the maintainership of gdal in debian. Due to several constraints (preparing a fair, problems with our mailserver, illness) I couldn't write this email in meantime.
As you surely have realized I have very limited time to maintain the gdal package in a way that is sufficient for the demands - especially since gdal is a very important package. Therefore I would like to propose a maintainership for gdal as this has been done for grass: officially debianGIS is the maintainer and there are several co-maintainers who prepare the different packages. In my opinion Claudio would be a good choice to co-maintain the package - but it would be great if there are even more volunteers and I am open for any other suggestions. What do you think? And what would I have to do to change the maintainer field if we decide to have gdal maintained by debianGIS? Many greetings, Silke BTW: I am currently on a GIS fair where we have an own booth. I still can read emails but it can take a few hours to read or to write emails. It took me 1 hour to write this short email. -- Intevation GmbH Georgstrasse 4 49074 Osnabrück, Germany http://intevation.de http://intevation.de/~silke FreeGIS.org http://freegis.org/
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkgfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel