-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 So wouldn't it be feasible/better wait until they'll fix this? All the best. pc
Francesco Paolo Lovergine ha scritto: >> This is relevant. I would move those data into a non-free package a part. >> That would involve re-packaging the upstream tarball, of course. > > > That will be probably fixed by EPSG with re-licensing, by rumors... > BTW, it involves gdal, proj and possibly others. > - -- Paolo Cavallini email+jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.faunalia.it Piazza Garibaldi 5 - 56025 Pontedera (PI), Italy Tel: (+39)348-3801953 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE2ami/NedwLUzIr4RAjBEAKCuucwETfrBBLjev9sPDXxNI/lWygCfZxvy 6Dp4oBenAz6s5msiRV75Zr0= =Av9l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
