Hi, On May 18 18:05, Giovanni Mascellani wrote: > > Problems were not finished: Josm didn't compile, because it now relies > on classes such as sun.net.www.protocol.http.Handler and > sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection, which are present in > official Sun compiler, but not in GCJ, which we are using. Using the Sun class is a temporary workaround to support a body in DELETE statements that should go away once diff uploads are implemented.
> So, the question is: should we move to Sun's javac, or do you know some > workaround for this? I've just updated josm-plugins (which can't be > build right now, because it depends on too recent josm) and josm (which > fails to build for the reason I just underlined) to SVN. I'd say let's wait until support for api 0.6 is properly implemented in josm and upload a new version then. > Another word to Andreas: we're currently shipping josm-plugins under > GPL-3+. Do you agree to move to GPL-2+ like we've done for josm? Yes, of course :) Regards, Andreas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
