Hi Mike,

jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com ha scritto:
> I can understand that no one is really interested in the package,
> but it is needed to use josm properly. If you don't have it, you
> cannot use josm properly.

This is not true: without this program you can't use, only in some
cases, one of the many plugins of Josm. Sure, it can be annoying, but
it's quite different from not using Josm at all.

> The ITP bug report is here:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=569040
> The git repo is here :
> http://github.com/h4ck3rm1k3/webkitimageqt
> The package builds and I cleaned up the packaging a bit.

I think it would be better to build it within the josm-plugins package,
as an additional binary package. Unfortunately, josm and josm-plugins
are bothering us quite a lot with license-related issues. When I'll have
the time to work again on it, I'll consider building a new binary
package for webkit-image.

Meanwhile, if you want to help for this, you're welcome!

Thanks, Giovanni.
Giovanni Mascellani <mascell...@poisson.phc.unipi.it>
Pisa, Italy

Web: http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani
Jabber: g.mascell...@jabber.org / giova...@elabor.homelinux.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Pkg-grass-devel mailing list

Reply via email to