I will build a plugins package with all plugins individually .

what about :

and two virtual packages :

etc.. patches to github, I can host them on tuxfamily as well,
would be great to become a developer. I have been wanting to do that anyway.

On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Giovanni Mascellani
<g.mascell...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Mike,
> jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com ha scritto:
>> I can understand that no one is really interested in the package,
>> but it is needed to use josm properly. If you don't have it, you
>> cannot use josm properly.
> This is not true: without this program you can't use, only in some
> cases, one of the many plugins of Josm. Sure, it can be annoying, but
> it's quite different from not using Josm at all.
>> The ITP bug report is here:
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=569040
>> The git repo is here :
>> http://github.com/h4ck3rm1k3/webkitimageqt
>> The package builds and I cleaned up the packaging a bit.
> I think it would be better to build it within the josm-plugins package,
> as an additional binary package. Unfortunately, josm and josm-plugins
> are bothering us quite a lot with license-related issues. When I'll have
> the time to work again on it, I'll consider building a new binary
> package for webkit-image.
> Meanwhile, if you want to help for this, you're welcome!
> Thanks, Giovanni.
> --
> Giovanni Mascellani <mascell...@poisson.phc.unipi.it>
> Pisa, Italy
> Web: http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani
> Jabber: g.mascell...@jabber.org / giova...@elabor.homelinux.org

Pkg-grass-devel mailing list

Reply via email to