Francesco, On 06/26/2013 11:11 AM, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > please provide the correct required tags to upstream/debian branches at every > new release.
Thanks, good point. I simply didn't think about that. In a similar vein: is it okay to create beta branches? Maybe 'upstream-beta' and 'beta' to start packaging on postgis-2.1 (or any other beta release in the future)? > About libgdal-dev versus libgdal1-dev, the proper dependency is libgdal-dev, > the old libgdal1-dev should be considered only for back-compatibility. > In this specific case I would use something like > > libgdal-dev | libgdal1-dev > > until the old releases still will be considered for backports. The reasoning behind that was that postgis-2.0 will hardly ever be compatible to a libgdal2-dev. > Ratio: we will neve provide multiple versions of gdal development packages, > so using a versioned name is pointless and inconsistent. I see. Will change to the proposed variant above. Regards Markus _______________________________________________ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkgemail@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel