Hi Mònica, On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 11:21:46AM +0100, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote: > > I personally see no reason for keeping [email protected]. As far as > > I can see the persons behind this team are also members of pkg-grass. > > OSM related packages are spread for no visible reason over both projects > > and I think we have a fair chance to reduce confusion by merging them all > > into pkg-grass. Please let me know if you disagree. > > It's ok for me. I've just subscribed to pkg-gras-devel list :-)
:-) > Please, let me know if you have any rule or protocol in pkg-grass team I > should follow. There are not only rules - they are currently in flux for a final release so if you have some opinion about the rules you have a good chance that these will be regarded: https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2013/12/msg00003.html > > After reading #725186 I think it makes sense to wait a couple of days > > for an answer of Emmanuel since your latest progress report is from > > yesterday. May be he will be able to upload a fixed > > libmetadata-extractor-java quickly and thus you would spend your time > > into outdated josm version which I would not call very productive. > > We don't have any response yet, but if upstream is involved in patching > this library, maybe we should wait a little bit more. Right. I do not see any need for hurring up since I now understood the blocker. > > Thanks for your work on this and feel free to ping me if I could be > > of any help (but please do not expect much help from me regarding > > actual Java code :-(). > > Thanks a lot :) Thanks for what? ;-) I have not done anything but chatting up to now. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de _______________________________________________ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
