Dear Ruby Maintainers. > Dear colleagues, > > you're hearing from me because ruby2.0 is going away, and one of > your packages depends or build-depends on ruby or a related package. > > A new ruby metapackage (src:ruby-defaults) that changes the list of > supported ruby interpreters to only 2.1 will enter sid today. > > While 2.0 and 2.1 are very similar and thus, we don't expect any > real breakage, please ensure your package still works with ruby2.1, > and, if it (build-)depends on (lib)ruby2.0, please drop that > dependency in favor of (lib)ruby2.1 (or better, one of the meta > packages).
I don't understand why you haven't rebuild these packages with Ruby 2.1 to verify whether they build, and file bugs for those that don't. > Bas Couwenberg <sebas...@xs4all.nl> > geos (U) > mapserver (U) I've rebuild these two packages, and they both build fine with Ruby 2.1 Please BinNMU them when Ruby 2.0 is removed. > Debian GIS Project <firstname.lastname@example.org> > geos > mapserver > ruby-hdfeos5 > ruby-hdfeos5 (1.2-1) > ruby-narray-miss > ruby-netcdf > ruby-netcdf (0.6.6-2) I've not rebuild the ruby-* packages listed above. There is currently work in progress to update the NetCDF packages, so if there are Ruby 2.1 issues they may be addressed in the process. Kind Regards, Bas _______________________________________________ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkgemail@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel