Dear Ruby Maintainers.
> Dear colleagues,
> you're hearing from me because ruby2.0 is going away, and one of
> your packages depends or build-depends on ruby or a related package.
> A new ruby metapackage (src:ruby-defaults) that changes the list of
> supported ruby interpreters to only 2.1 will enter sid today.
> While 2.0 and 2.1 are very similar and thus, we don't expect any
> real breakage, please ensure your package still works with ruby2.1,
> and, if it (build-)depends on (lib)ruby2.0, please drop that
> dependency in favor of (lib)ruby2.1 (or better, one of the meta
I don't understand why you haven't rebuild these packages with Ruby 2.1 to
verify whether they build, and file bugs for those that don't.
> Bas Couwenberg <sebas...@xs4all.nl>
> geos (U)
> mapserver (U)
I've rebuild these two packages, and they both build fine with Ruby 2.1
Please BinNMU them when Ruby 2.0 is removed.
> Debian GIS Project <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> ruby-hdfeos5 (1.2-1)
> ruby-netcdf (0.6.6-2)
I've not rebuild the ruby-* packages listed above. There is currently work
in progress to update the NetCDF packages, so if there are Ruby 2.1 issues
they may be addressed in the process.
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list