On 19-07-15 20:38, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 07/03/2015 03:13 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>  - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package
>>    maintainers decision if a transition is needed.  However this might
>>    break software which is not in the Debian archive, and built
>>    against these packages.
> This is the case for pktools. It has no reverse dependencies, and I'm
> not worried about possible software outside the Debian archive.
> When the new libstdc++ is moved to unstable, we only need to update the
> symbols for all architectures.

It's currently not possible to build pktools due to
libboost-date-time1.55.0 & libdap being uninstallable.

I have the symbols updated for amd64 with GCC 5 ready in git, but that
cant' be uploaded yet.

Kind Regards,


 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1

Pkg-grass-devel mailing list

Reply via email to