Control: block -1 by 777955

On 03-08-15 14:37, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 19-07-15 20:38, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 07/03/2015 03:13 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>>  - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package
>>>    maintainers decision if a transition is needed.  However this might
>>>    break software which is not in the Debian archive, and built
>>>    against these packages.
>> This is the case for pktools. It has no reverse dependencies, and I'm
>> not worried about possible software outside the Debian archive.
>> When the new libstdc++ is moved to unstable, we only need to update the
>> symbols for all architectures.
> It's currently not possible to build pktools due to
> libboost-date-time1.55.0 & libdap being uninstallable.
> I have the symbols updated for amd64 with GCC 5 ready in git, but that
> cant' be uploaded yet.

With the start of the gdal transition (#756867) and the rebuilt liblas
(#777955) it has now become possible to build pktools again. I've
uploaded a new revision to experimental with updated symbols for GCC 5
on amd64.

I'll gather the symbols for the other architectures after the buildds
have built the new revision in experimental. The subsequent upload to
unstable will resolve this issue, but requires liblas to to upload to
unstable first.

Kind Regards,


 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1

Pkg-grass-devel mailing list

Reply via email to