-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
reassign 798855 openjdk-7-jre 7u85-2.6.1-5
Dear OpenJDK maintainers,
It seems that #508650 (empty windows for non-reparenting window
managers) has resurfaced, the issue can be reproduced using josm and
its 'Download from OSM' menu option under awesome.
The fix for #508650 was the introduction of the
_JAVA_AWT_WM_NONREPARENTING environment variable and related handling
in openjdk-6, these changes may have been lost in openjdk-7 and later.
Is such a change possible in openjdk-7, or at least openjdk-8 which
should become default in the not to distant future?
On 10-10-15 19:07, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 10-10-15 18:58, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> Quoting Sebastiaan Couwenberg (2015-10-10 15:58:42)
>>> On 14-09-15 00:23, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> On 14-09-15 00:07, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>>>> Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2015-09-14 00:00:23)
>>>>>> A possible difference - if you tested with both those DEs
>>>>>> installed - might be some package dependency missing
>>>>>> from josm or a java library which gets pulled in by
>>>>>> larger DEs and therefore often unnoticed. I use Awesome
>>>>>> and mostly GTK-based applications, avoiding both KDE and
>>>>>> GNOME as much as I can. I do generally respect
>>>>>> recommends, however - attached is the list of unsatisfied
>>>>>> reverse recommends (too long, as some are satisfied by
>>>>>> alternative packages).
>>>> Awesome doesn't appear to be a good choice of DE. I can
>>>> reproduce the problem with josm under awesome. This issue
>>>> should probably be reassigned to awesome, this isn't an
>>>> issue with josm.
>>> I've tested this issue with the new JOSM 8800 from
>>> experimental, which still has this issue.
>>> Interestingly the 'Download from OSM' window does work, new
>>> tiles get downloaded when zooming with the scroll wheel and
>>> hitting enter downloads the area in question, it just doesn't
>>> get rendered.
>>> Jonas, do you think it's worthwhile to reassign this issue to
>> Is it perhaps related to bug#508650? If so (or similar) I find
>> it wrong to file it against each specific window managers -
>> perhaps reassing to openjdk instead?
> #508650 surely sounds exactly like this issue, so reassigning to
> openjdk may be more appropriate indeed.
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list