Hi, On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Guillem Jover<[email protected]> wrote: > This package has a non-conventional name for a default package, the > -link postfix is a bit confusing. Could you rename it to libjgrapht-java > instead? Or is there a problem with using that one?
yes, both such packages are just bloat. Why not moving the unversioned symlink and the unversioned Provides field to the versioned libjgrapht0.6-java package? BTW, who files the removal request against the now obsolete libjgrapht-java source package? Cheers, Torsten _______________________________________________ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
