Hello, Torsten Werner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Guillem Jover<[email protected]> wrote: >> This package has a non-conventional name for a default package, the >> -link postfix is a bit confusing. Could you rename it to libjgrapht-java >> instead? Or is there a problem with using that one? > > yes, both such packages are just bloat. Why not moving the unversioned > symlink and the unversioned Provides field to the versioned > libjgrapht0.6-java package? Because in that case we cannot install libjgrapht0.6-java and libjgrapht0.7-java at the same time. > BTW, who files the removal request against the now obsolete > libjgrapht-java source package? I have never done that before and need to read about it first. I should have set the "Replaces" tag. Feel free to amend the branch0.6 in the pkg-java repository any time, please. Steffen _______________________________________________ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
