On Wednesday 07 December 2011 21:03:43 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Why not trying to find the problematic commit in the fop history instead?

I have tried to build the pdf against the trunk version of fop and it passes 
(revision 1211788).

Another user is confirming this on the fop users mailing list.

Vincent Hobeïka

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Reply via email to