On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 12:03:13 -0800, tony mancill wrote: > >>> The rename of the binary package from libclosure-compiler-java -> > >>> closure-compiler should probably be done now as well to get this out of > >>> the way well before the Jessie release.
> It means that the "closure-compiler" binary package is merely the > /usr/bin/ symlink and the dependency on jarwrapper. Can't this be solved with a simple Provides: closure-compiler in the libclosure-compiler-java package? (Or the other way round.) Having a de facto empty package doesn't seem very appealing to me. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Bob Dylan: Temporary like Achilles
Description: Digital signature
__ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.