On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 12:03:13 -0800, tony mancill wrote:

> >>> The rename of the binary package from libclosure-compiler-java ->
> >>> closure-compiler should probably be done now as well to get this out of
> >>> the way well before the Jessie release.

> It means that the "closure-compiler" binary package is merely the
> /usr/bin/ symlink and the dependency on jarwrapper.

Can't this be solved with a simple
    Provides: closure-compiler
in the libclosure-compiler-java package?
(Or the other way round.)

Having a de facto empty package doesn't seem very appealing to me.


 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Bob Dylan: Temporary like Achilles

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Reply via email to