On 04-Jan-2014, tony mancill wrote:
> On 01/04/2014 07:07 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> > […] the binary ‘closure-compiler’ package will not be empty. It will
> > need to install files distinct from the ‘libclosure-compiler-java’
> > package.
> Currently, that manpage would be the only file in the binary package, as
> /usr/bin/closure-compiler will remain a symlink to the executable jar, so
> it's still going to be a very small package.

A small package shouldn't be a problem, if the package serves a purpose
distinct from any other package.

Since the binary ‘closure-compiler’ package will have distinct dependencies
from the dependencies of the other binary packages, be in a separate
section of the archive, etc. the small size shouldn't disqualify it from
entry into the archive.

 \          “A thing moderately good is not so good as it ought to be. |
  `\        Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in |
_o__)                       principle is always a vice.” —Thomas Paine |
Ben Finney <b...@benfinney.id.au>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Reply via email to