Emmanuel Bourg <[email protected]> writes:
hello Emmanuel,
> Le 30/03/2018 à 09:41, Felix Natter a écrit :
>
>> Is the following ok for getting rid of the -java-doc package
>> (I don't think it makes sense to keep an older doc package)?
>>
>> Package: libknopflerfish-osgi-framework-java
>> Architecture: all
>> Depends: ${misc:Depends}
>> -Suggests: libknopflerfish-osgi-java-doc
>> +Provides: libknopflerfish-osgi-java-doc
>> +Conflicts: libknopflerfish-osgi-java-doc
>> +Replaces: libknopflerfish-osgi-java-doc
>
> libknopflerfish-osgi-java-doc has no reverse dependencies, no need to
> add these fields you can drop it directly.
Are you sure? Without these settings, libknopflerfish-osgi-java-doc-X
will still be kept if libknopflerfish-osgi-framework-java is updated to
Y, thus you have an old doc package lying around.
One important lintian is an FP (#894397)
W: libknopflerfish-osgi-framework-java:
incompatible-java-bytecode-format Java9 version (Class format: 53)
Would you want to sponsor this minor update?
knopflerfish-osgi (6.1.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Drop -java-doc package due to low popcon (Closes: #893221)
* Correct description (R5->R6)
* Priority extra->optional
* Install NOTICE.txt in main package
* Bump standards version to 4.1.3
-- Felix Natter <[email protected]> Fri, 30 Mar 2018 17:29:18 +0200
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/knopflerfish-osgi.git
Many Thanks and Best Regards,
--
Felix Natter
debian/rules!
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>.
Please use
[email protected] for discussions and questions.
