On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 17:00, Sean Whitton
<[email protected]> wrote:
+----------------------+
| REJECT reasoning |
+----------------------+
Given that the source has been repacked, you need a +dfsg or +ds
version suffix.
I did not know this was a valid reason for rejecting a package.
Developers reference says 'should' and not 'must'.
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-origtargz
I can't see it in https://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html or in
policy as well.
May be I'm missing something here? I have at least seen some packages
in archive which did not advertise repackaged source in version (don't
remember the names now). Does it mean they are RC bugs?
+----------------------+
| N.B. |
+----------------------+
This review may not be exhaustive. Please check your source package
against your d/copyright and the ftpmaster REJECT-FAQ, throughly,
before uploading to NEW again.
Thank you for your time and contribution!
Sean
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
