On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 11:40, Sean Whitton <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hello Pirate,
On Thu 20 Aug 2020 at 11:53PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 17:00, Sean Whitton
<[email protected]> wrote:
+----------------------+
| REJECT reasoning |
+----------------------+
Given that the source has been repacked, you need a +dfsg or +ds
version suffix.
I did not know this was a valid reason for rejecting a package.
Developers reference says 'should' and not 'must'.
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-origtargz
I can't see it in https://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html or
in
policy as well.
May be I'm missing something here? I have at least seen some
packages
in archive which did not advertise repackaged source in version
(don't
remember the names now). Does it mean they are RC bugs?
This was done as a courtesy for you, as accepting the upload may have
made it harder to fix. For example, if you prefer to use ~dfsg then
the
accepted upload would block that.
Thanks for the explanation. I hope Nilesh would fix it.
--
Sean Whitton
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
