On 3/26/22 12:56 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
No, not SPF, I mean DKIM[1]
it is not a policy framework, but rather a signature (not GPG) on your
mail validating it to be sent from your domain.
Unlike SPF, it is more robust by design.

You need not sell DKIM to me.

I believe issue for SPF and DKIM is same: Debian administrators
administrate only services tied to the debian.org domain (and
_delegation_ of services tied to debian.net).

Looks like I misunderstood you earlier. Fair enough.

If you want to debunk that point of mine as well, [...]

I do not want to debunk your point.

Sure, that wasn't the point of my mail either :)

Ok.  I am then still in the dark about your point of suggesting me in
particular for moving this forward.

I was (a few mails earlier), hoping that you might administer the new list, if 
we happen to get it.
(And no, this does not mean that you'd engage in filtering spam, although it 
only takes
a couple of clicks usually)

I just replied to the bug with the information that listmasters need,
with you in CC.

Will see if it gets processed.

Not sure why you cc'ed me that followup to the bugreport,

Well, since we just had 'a thread of conversation' about it, and you pointed me 
to
a HOWTO, I thought I'd keep you in loop(?). No motive here other than that.

but am not in
the mood for guessing as to your motives, so just informing you that
again I am clueless.

I think at this point all discussion is done. So let's end the conversation 
here, shall we.






Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Reply via email to