Hi,
Your upload of monaco-editor 0.47.0+ds-1 to the NEW queue has had an automated
review: an LLM-based check of its licensing and packaging, run by the DFSG team
using the Debian Inference service. It is not a decision on the package, and -
like other LLM-based work - it can be wrong.
It found 0 blocker, 2 important, 2 minor issues:
- [important] [licensing] Files: src/basic-languages/wgsl/* names only Google
LLC, but the files are Microsoft Corporation and Google LLC, and
wgsl.contribution.ts is Microsoft's alone
- [important] [packaging] debian/build.sh and debian/node-monaco-editor.links
point at /usr/share/fonts/truetype/codicons/codicon.ttf, but fonts-codicons
installs the font in /usr/share/fonts-codicons/
- [minor] [licensing] Files: src/basic-languages/postiats/* attributes
postiats.contribution.ts to Artyom Shalkhakov, but Microsoft holds its copyright
- [minor] [licensing] debian/copyright does not record the Apache-2.0
TypeScript compiler that the generated tree embeds
You can read the full review here:
https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/reviews/monaco-editor#assistant-report
Please look at it, and respond by visiting the link below (you'll be asked to
authenticate with Salsa first):
https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/llm-review/Uwb6V4dyNSZdiNhwUtHFyysbHRvbXu-A
There you may choose to reject the upload yourself, while you fix issues and
re-upload, or add comments to clarify or dispute the review.
Your comments are for the DFSG team member who reviews the package, not for the
LLM: it will not read them or reply. Tell the reviewer where you think the
automated review is right or wrong, and why. Comments are public and shown with
the review; you may use markdown, e.g. to link to clarifying information.
If you have any questions, please reply to this e-mail and someone from the
team will respond.
Thanks!
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
