Hi,
Your upload of monaco-editor 0.47.0+ds-1 to the NEW queue has had an automated
review: an LLM-based check of its licensing and packaging, run by the DFSG team
using the Debian Inference service. It is not a decision on the package, and -
like other LLM-based work - it can be wrong.
It found 0 blocker, 1 important, 1 minor issues:
- [important] [packaging] codicon font is taken from and linked to
/usr/share/fonts/truetype/codicons/codicon.ttf, but fonts-codicons installs
into /usr/share/fonts-codicons/
- [minor] [licensing] Source field used inside a Files stanza, which
copyright-format 1.0 does not allow there
You can read the full review here:
https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/reviews/monaco-editor#assistant-report
Please look at it, and respond by visiting the link below (you'll be asked to
authenticate with Salsa first):
https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/llm-review/PYBHTXm02O_u_MO48STJ5BRgiHyRvnET
There you may choose to reject the upload yourself, while you fix issues and
re-upload, or add comments to clarify or dispute the review.
Your comments are for the DFSG team member who reviews the package, not for the
LLM: it will not read them or reply. Tell the reviewer where you think the
automated review is right or wrong, and why. Comments are public and shown with
the review; you may use markdown, e.g. to link to clarifying information.
If you have any questions, please reply to this e-mail and someone from the
team will respond.
Thanks!
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
