On 11-12-04 at 07:06pm, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> writes: > > > Not sure if the proper approach is to reasign or file another bug > > and make one of them affect the other - and since I maintain both > > packages I will simply spend my time on fixing the issue instead :-) > > Commendably practical; thanks for the prompt fix. :-) It looks like > you may need to nudge the buildd maintainers, though; I'm not one > myself, just a regular DD who keeps tabs on packages showing up on > amd64 but not i386 or vice versa.
The package needs a minor update anyway - I just wanted to wait another cycle (and get some sleep) to ensure the fixed d-shlibs had entered unstable, as I don't want to use versioned dependencies for bugfixes if avoidable. But thanks for the reminder anyway :-) - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel