On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-06-15 at 09:28pm, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Right. At least it would be nice to use the same minifier tool than
> > upstream in the hope to generate the same minified file then.
> I disagree. That would be comparable to using same C compiler with same
Well, it's not exactly on the same scope, no. Minifying changes the
"appearance" of the file, not its intrinsic nature.
> As I understand it, the need for producing identical minification output
> is only to ease identification of those files, which I believe is better
> and more reliably done by hashing, with no ill sideeffects (e.g. some
> minifiers sometimes produce broken output).
I agree that hashing would be more reliable, but it's also much more
work for everybody and the infrastructure doesn't exist yet... so I don't
see why using the same minifier could not be a sane recommendation in
the mean time.
> Does it make sense now?
Yes, thank you for the explanation.
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Get the Debian Administrator's Handbook: