Hi Ansgar,

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 01:03:48PM +0000, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Hi,

> why does d/copyright say "Expat or GPL-2+"? The upstream sources contain a
> notice saying "Released under the MIT and GPL Licenses." (i.e. any version of
> the GPL).

> Note that "MIT License" might refer to one of several licenses.

> It would probably be best if upstream included the full text of the licenses 
> to
> avoid any uncertainties.

As indicated in the Comment field of the debian/copyright file,
referring to the following url:
I asked upstream some clarification about the license. The answer has
been what is mentionned in the copyright file: GPL-2+ or Expat.

Unfortunately, this does not appear yet clearly in the code. I'll insist
that they include clearly the license in the code.



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list

Reply via email to