Cédric Boutillier <bou...@debian.org> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 01:03:48PM +0000, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> why does d/copyright say "Expat or GPL-2+"? The upstream sources contain a
>> notice saying "Released under the MIT and GPL Licenses." (i.e. any version of
>> the GPL).
>> Note that "MIT License" might refer to one of several licenses.
>> It would probably be best if upstream included the full text of the licenses
>> avoid any uncertainties.
> As indicated in the Comment field of the debian/copyright file,
> referring to the following url:
> I asked upstream some clarification about the license. The answer has
> been what is mentionned in the copyright file: GPL-2+ or Expat.
Ah, sorry. I somehow missed the Comments field.