On 11/10/13 10:20, Jérémy Lal wrote: > On 11/10/2013 09:47, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> On 11/05/13 17:46, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote: >>> Hi Jérémy, >>> >>> On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 23:35 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote: >>>> On 05/05/2013 22:45, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote: >>>>> Hi Jérémy, >>>>> >>>>> What do you think about backport nodejs to wheezy? >>>> When the migration from nodejs 0.6 to nodejs 0.10 is finished, >>>> all new packages will go to testing and be good candidates for backports. >>>> >>>> The current status is : >>>> >>>> * nodejs 0.10, libv8-3.14 are in experimental >>>> * node-gyp isn't but is not tested enough >>>> * i haven't set up a migration yet. Give me a few days... >>>> Almost all modules will need to be updated, and all c++ addons >>>> be moved to node-gyp instead of node-waf. >>>> >>>> However i don't think it is a good idea to backport npm, it is a >>>> lot of work and being mostly a development tool, people will probably >>>> better be using it in testing/sid. >>> thanks for the feedback ;) >>> >>> >>>> Of course, as usual, any help is welcome. >>> Yes, I will try it. >> >> I'm just wondering if anybody else thinks a wheezy-backports version of >> nodejs is feasible? >> >> I've run it on wheezy and built my own packages (pegjs, jssip) on wheezy >> and all seems OK > Do you backport libv8 too ?
Just looking at the system where I did this, I notice it is not pure wheezy It has a version of libv8 depending on libc >= 2.14 - I simply pulled the packages selectively from testing some months ago Has anybody tried a build of libv8 in a pure wheezy system? _______________________________________________ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
