2015-05-17 21:07 GMT+02:00 Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk>: > Hi Jérémy, > > Quoting Jérémy Lal (2015-05-17 19:56:06) > > it seems dh_acc or direct call of abi-compliance-checker could play > > the role of checking when the ABI breaks. > > However, this doesn't fit well with a soname based on upstream > > version: it could happen that version 3.50.1 is compatible with > > version 3.49.12, and 3.50.2 breaking compatibility with 3.50.1. > > So i'd like to move to an integer based soname that is incremented > > each time there is a detected abi break by a.c.c. > > I can do this as soon as the next v8 upload. > > Sounds good to me! > > I am not an expert in soname handling, though. I think the common > thinking is that we should not as distro "invent" SONAME but leave that > yo upstream, because ideally it should be identical across distros. But > concretely for v8 I guess that is highly unlikely to happen - and we > should deal with it when it does.
i did not think in terms of other distros... which is a good argument against any non-clearly-needed change. Since adding a.c.c. can be done without other changes, i'll just do that and wait for necessity to happen. > You might wanna consult d-devel@l.d.o - as you know my judgement have > been horribly wrong in the past :-) > > Hmmm maybe another time :) Jérémy
_______________________________________________ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
