On വ്യാഴം 05 ജനുവരി 2017 06:44 വൈകു, Ximin Luo wrote: > It's normal convention in any organisation or project to temporarily revert a > change that is controversial.
ok. > Adding 10 new people from an event, every time there is an event, is also not > sustainable as a team. I have organized many packaging workshops over the years. I don't grant access to any one just because they attended an event. I have granted them access only because I am convinced they qualify to get this access. They learned how to make a package lintian clean, how run a clean build using sbuild, make patches using quilt, how to repack. They did all this by themselves on 3-4 packages that was already packaged before they started with a new package. > Please respond to my points (about responsibility, maintenance and events) > instead of accusing me of "contempt" simply because I disagreed with your > actions. We do not have such rules for accepting a first package or granting them access to a project. I was only following the convention we have set for this team. > I also don't see why you are making such a fuss. The conditions I described > (making a request at a later date, individually) are not particularly hard to > achieve, and helps to confirm their true long-term interest in being a team > member, to the rest of us that are unsure about these events. I make a fuss because you are acting arbitrarily, making up policies and rules on the go.
Description: OpenPGP digital signature