On ചൊവ്വ 10 ഒക്ടോബര് 2017 12:31 വൈകു, Chris Lamb wrote: > No. > > Pirate, please read over the following extremely carefully before replying > as I would like to avoid either of us becoming frustrated by these repeated > failures at conversation. > > The situation, as I understand it, is as follows: > > a) You uploaded 6.25.0+dfsg-13 with a debian/copyright including the > following: > > 11 Files: packages/babel-preset-es2015/test/fixtures/traceur/* > 12 Copyright: [yyyy] [name of copyright owner] > 13 License: Apache-2.0 > 14 Comment: name of copyright holder is missing > > b) This "[yyyy] [name of copyright owner]" placeholder text comes > from the LICENSE file. > > c) The portion of the LICENSE file where it comes from is part of > the usual "How to apply this license to your own code." This is > what was meant by "meta statement" in my original REJECT. > > d) The statement in debian/copyright therefore has no meaning > whatsover, likely just a false positive from whatever tool you > are using to generate such files. > > e) (It is therefore totally irrelevant to this disuss whether the > tests are used, whether the package is "useful", whether its > packages in NEW or contrib depend on it, etc. You seem fixated > on this point.)
I have suggested two possible solutions and you seem to be fixated on the semantics of the problem than a solution. Now with those files removed from the source tarball, lets move on. Please see if the current uploads in NEW meets the criteria.
Description: OpenPGP digital signature