>No, when no options are passed to "john", the word mangling is not the >last step.
Ok, thank you. What seems strange to me, however, is that the rules option needs a wordlist option on the command line. Why not using the one in the config file if no wordlist is provided explicitely? >"... With no cracking mode requested >explicitly, John will start with "single crack" mode (pass 1), then >proceed with wordlist mode (pass 2), and finally with "incremental" mode >(pass 3). The pass numbers are reported on the status line, too." > >Maybe this information should be in other places in the documentation as >well (in README or in OPTIONS?) In my opinion, yes. And you could state explicitely that no mangling happens on the wordlist. >Yes, this is in fact the case. If you have multiple wordlists, it is >recommended that you combine them with "cat ... | unique NEW-FILE", >where "unique" is the included symlink to "john". Probably it would be useful to put this information somewhere in the docs. Thank you for john. -- Pkg-john-devel mailing list Pkgfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-john-devel