Of course, it will be okay, for me, but (only just for fun) i find a
better from a freebsd md5 code:

" * "THE BEER-WARE LICENSE" (Revision 42):
 * <p...@login.dknet.dk> wrote this file.  As long as you retain this
notice you
 * can do whatever you want with this stuff. If we meet some day, and
you think
 * this stuff is worth it, you can buy me a beer in return.
Poul-Henning Kamp"



David Paleino wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 23:12:21 -0800 (PST), David Luyer wrote:
>> For any and all contributions I have made to JtR, please consider
>> these contributions to be licensed under GPL version 2 as of the
>> date of the submission of the patches to the JtR email list, which
>> for the mentioned files was 2005.
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 00:33:32 +0100, Bucsay Balázs wrote:
>> I think the license behove to bartavelle first, by the way gplv2 would
>> be good for me too.
> Bartavelle already stated a license for "all his contributions", thus 
> including
> this file. You can read its statement at:
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-john-devel/2009-January/000251.html
> The text of the license is as follows:
>>  * This software may be modified, redistributed, and used for any purpose,
>>  * so long as its origin is acknowledged.
> Is it ok for both of you (David and Balázs)?
> For other choices, please read (also bartavelle):
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-john-devel/2009-January/000232.html
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-john-devel/2009-January/000258.html
> Kindly,
> David

Pkg-john-devel mailing list

Reply via email to