block 621431 621460 thank you On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 05:16, Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> wrote: > Am 07.04.2011 04:18, schrieb Michael Biebl: >> Am 07.04.2011 04:05, schrieb Michael Biebl: >>> Am 07.04.2011 04:04, schrieb Michael Biebl: >>>> Hi Ondřej >>>> Am 06.04.2011 22:57, schrieb Ondřej Surý: >>>> >>>> My package has: >>>> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 8), cmake (>= 2.4), kdelibs5-dev, libsvn-dev >>>> (>= >>>> 1.2.0), libssl-dev (>= 0.9.8a), libsqlite3-dev, gettext, pkg-kde-tools (>= >>>> 0.9) >>>> >>>> >>>> So this must me a indirect dependency. This is nothing I can do about in >>>> kdesvn >>>> itself as kdesvn is not using libdb directly, thus closing. >>> >>> My guess is that is is pulled in via libsvn. >>> As soon as libsvn has been updated, a binNMU of kdesvn should be sufficient. >> hm, maybe it's better to keep the bug open, if you want to track of the libdb >> removal archive wide. >> Please let me know, as soon as you have filed a bug against libsvn-dev. Let's >> then block this bug by the bug against libsvn-dev. >> As soon as libsvn-dev is fixed, we can "fix" the kdesvn bug by a binNMU.
I am adding the blocked by. I'll try to do as much micromanagement like this as possible, but it's a huge task since we have db4.6, db4.7 and db4.8 in the archive, so please forgive any mistakes I may do. > I've looked into this more closely. > kdesvn uses libsvn and runs > apu-config --link-ld --libs > to get the necessary link flags. > This outputs: > > -L/usr/lib -laprutil-1 -ldb > > and > ls -la /usr/lib/libdb.so > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 12. Feb 04:31 /usr/lib/libdb.so -> libdb-4.8.so > > this link is shipped by libdb4.8-dev. > I guess you need to start fixing things there. The link is also shipped by libdb5.1-dev, so I think everything is fine here. O. -- Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org> http://blog.rfc1925.org/ _______________________________________________ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
